<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Portland widget startups on the cusp of something big</title>
	<link>http://siliconflorist.com/2008/03/21/portland-widget-startups-on-the-cusp-of-something-big/</link>
	<description>Rose City + Silicon Forest</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 08:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Berkley</title>
		<link>http://siliconflorist.com/2008/03/21/portland-widget-startups-on-the-cusp-of-something-big/#comment-2393</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Berkley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 21:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://siliconflorist.com/2008/03/21/portland-widget-startups-on-the-cusp-of-something-big/#comment-2393</guid>
		<description>Great post, Rick!  You really nailed it. 

Scott, regarding monetization of widgets...  As "social advertisements" (marketing context), widgets are by-definition monetizable, as you point out. However, there are also compelling e-commerce and 3rd party advertising opportunities for monetization. In this sense, a widget is not very different than a concentional web site (a distributable web site, that is).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, Rick!  You really nailed it. </p>
<p>Scott, regarding monetization of widgets&#8230;  As &#8220;social advertisements&#8221; (marketing context), widgets are by-definition monetizable, as you point out. However, there are also compelling e-commerce and 3rd party advertising opportunities for monetization. In this sense, a widget is not very different than a concentional web site (a distributable web site, that is).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mediaChick (Michelle Anderson)</title>
		<link>http://siliconflorist.com/2008/03/21/portland-widget-startups-on-the-cusp-of-something-big/#comment-2381</link>
		<dc:creator>mediaChick (Michelle Anderson)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 16:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://siliconflorist.com/2008/03/21/portland-widget-startups-on-the-cusp-of-something-big/#comment-2381</guid>
		<description>"Distributed Marketing Applications" huh? Certainly a more impressive name for powerful widget technology. So, should we nickname them DMAs? Marketing Apps? Ooo ... MApps! Or how about The Apps Formerly Known as Widgets?

=)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Distributed Marketing Applications&#8221; huh? Certainly a more impressive name for powerful widget technology. So, should we nickname them DMAs? Marketing Apps? Ooo &#8230; MApps! Or how about The Apps Formerly Known as Widgets?</p>
<p>=)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Andreas</title>
		<link>http://siliconflorist.com/2008/03/21/portland-widget-startups-on-the-cusp-of-something-big/#comment-2374</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Andreas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 14:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://siliconflorist.com/2008/03/21/portland-widget-startups-on-the-cusp-of-something-big/#comment-2374</guid>
		<description>I agree that widgets are a great way to offer persistent, positive opportunities for brand interaction.  Nike+ is another great example of this; it's on my Dashboard, in my shoe, and in my nano - and I love it.

But I don't see much of a future for monetizing independent widgets outside of a marketing context.  They're really cool and easy to create, but it'd be tough to get people to pony up.

RIAs?  Maybe.  Mobile?  Yep.  But widgets?  Not by themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that widgets are a great way to offer persistent, positive opportunities for brand interaction.  Nike+ is another great example of this; it&#8217;s on my Dashboard, in my shoe, and in my nano - and I love it.</p>
<p>But I don&#8217;t see much of a future for monetizing independent widgets outside of a marketing context.  They&#8217;re really cool and easy to create, but it&#8217;d be tough to get people to pony up.</p>
<p>RIAs?  Maybe.  Mobile?  Yep.  But widgets?  Not by themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.354 seconds -->
