<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Zloop: Simple social networking for almost anyone</title>
	<link>http://siliconflorist.com/2008/04/11/zloop-simple-social-networking-for-almost-anyone/</link>
	<description>Rose City + Silicon Forest</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brett A. Meyers</title>
		<link>http://siliconflorist.com/2008/04/11/zloop-simple-social-networking-for-almost-anyone/#comment-2938</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett A. Meyers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 20:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://siliconflorist.com/2008/04/11/zloop-simple-social-networking-for-almost-anyone/#comment-2938</guid>
		<description>Rick,

Thank you much for not only your well written write-up, but also taking the time for a detailed discussion a few weeks ago. It was great to hear your initial feedback and thoughts all were were very valuable to take down.

Wanted to leave contact info for anyone else that is interested in connecting on why we're so excited about what we've built...
E: bmeyers@zloop.com
M: 805-459-6139

Thanks again Rick!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick,</p>
<p>Thank you much for not only your well written write-up, but also taking the time for a detailed discussion a few weeks ago. It was great to hear your initial feedback and thoughts all were were very valuable to take down.</p>
<p>Wanted to leave contact info for anyone else that is interested in connecting on why we&#8217;re so excited about what we&#8217;ve built&#8230;<br />
E: <a href="mailto:bmeyers@zloop.com">bmeyers@zloop.com</a><br />
M: 805-459-6139</p>
<p>Thanks again Rick!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Turoczy</title>
		<link>http://siliconflorist.com/2008/04/11/zloop-simple-social-networking-for-almost-anyone/#comment-2930</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Turoczy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 00:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://siliconflorist.com/2008/04/11/zloop-simple-social-networking-for-almost-anyone/#comment-2930</guid>
		<description>Holy carp, Casey! Nice comment. And truly thoughtful insight.

The fact that you composed this response on a Friday afternoon both impresses me and scares me at the same time.

You win!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holy carp, Casey! Nice comment. And truly thoughtful insight.</p>
<p>The fact that you composed this response on a Friday afternoon both impresses me and scares me at the same time.</p>
<p>You win!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Casey Cuddy</title>
		<link>http://siliconflorist.com/2008/04/11/zloop-simple-social-networking-for-almost-anyone/#comment-2929</link>
		<dc:creator>Casey Cuddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 00:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://siliconflorist.com/2008/04/11/zloop-simple-social-networking-for-almost-anyone/#comment-2929</guid>
		<description>At first glance, seems to fit well with not only closed-loop affinity networks, but also for location-awareness and temporary socnets ("tempnets") that then allow for transitions to other "permanets" via data portability. Imagine joining a Zloop at a concert, or a family reunion, and then transitioning it to a more robust, permanent socnet later. Once data portability is a reality, look for larger socnets to PAY smaller tempnets as "referrers" of users/groups, perhaps.

However, given the proliferation of socnets overall, I'm hesitant to think that anyone, let alone a closed-loop net with limited functionality, can rise above the noise to generate a mass base that can then be monetized. Unless the small socnet has unique, next-gen features that can plug into a larger socnet's app as value-add, exit by acquisition might be unlikely, if even desired. Pursuing the "standalone widget" strategy is, perhaps, a good way of differentiating now, and exiting later; hence the need for not just simplicity, but uniqueness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At first glance, seems to fit well with not only closed-loop affinity networks, but also for location-awareness and temporary socnets (&#8221;tempnets&#8221;) that then allow for transitions to other &#8220;permanets&#8221; via data portability. Imagine joining a Zloop at a concert, or a family reunion, and then transitioning it to a more robust, permanent socnet later. Once data portability is a reality, look for larger socnets to PAY smaller tempnets as &#8220;referrers&#8221; of users/groups, perhaps.</p>
<p>However, given the proliferation of socnets overall, I&#8217;m hesitant to think that anyone, let alone a closed-loop net with limited functionality, can rise above the noise to generate a mass base that can then be monetized. Unless the small socnet has unique, next-gen features that can plug into a larger socnet&#8217;s app as value-add, exit by acquisition might be unlikely, if even desired. Pursuing the &#8220;standalone widget&#8221; strategy is, perhaps, a good way of differentiating now, and exiting later; hence the need for not just simplicity, but uniqueness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.413 seconds -->
